My autoconf version is 2.13. m4 is GNU m4 1.4.
I have the following in my configure.in:
AC_CHECK_FUNCS(dlopen, , AC_CHECK_LIB(dl,dlopen, ,
[AC_MSG_ERROR([
*** Zen does not function properly without dlopen, sorry.])]))
The idea is to check for dlopen, and if it's not found, check for it
in
On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 12:05:28AM -0700, Tom Tromey wrote:
: > "Lars" == Lars J Aas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: Lars> Anyways, are the people that count looking into this patch? I'd
: Lars> prefer it if it was applied or rejected as soon as possible
: Lars> instead of waiting in the dark..
On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 11:36:03PM -0700, Tom Tromey wrote:
: > "Lars" == Lars J Aas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
:
: Lars> Any point in these spaces?
:
: Nope. I checked this in.
:
: Please send a ChangeLog entry with your patches.
Is it really any point in ChangeLog entries for such smal
When I run CVS Automake, the .c.o and .c.lo rules become like this:
| .c.o:
|
| @AMDEP@ source='$<' object='$@' libtool=no @AMDEPBACKSLASH@
| @AMDEP@ depfile='$(DEPDIR)/$*.Po' tmpdepfile='$(DEPDIR)/$*.TPo' @AMDEPBACKSLASH@
| @AMDEP@ $(CCDEPMODE) $(depcomp) @AMDEPBACKSLASH@
| $(COMPILE) -
Hi,
How can I make a Makefile based on automake to be conditionnal
at make time and not at configure time.
I have to do this in my Makefile :
ifeq "$(shell if [ -f $(DEPEND) ]; then echo EXISTS; fi)" ""
all: $(PROG)
include $(DEPEND)
else
all: depend
endif
So it requires m
> "Lars" == Lars J Aas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Is it really any point in ChangeLog entries for such small
Lars> cosmetic details?
I like to document every change.
Tom
> "Lars" == Lars J Aas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> When I run CVS Automake, the .c.o and .c.lo rules become like this:
Lars> | .c.o:
Lars> |
Lars> | @AMDEP@ source='$<' object='$@' libtool=no @AMDEPBACKSLASH@
Thanks, that is definitely a bug.
I added another test to pr87.test to chec
Hello,
What is the state of per-object cflags in automake? Is anyone working on
them? If not, how difficult would it be to implement it?
Thanks,
Emil
On Feb 8, 2001, Tomas Berndtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My autoconf version is 2.13. m4 is GNU m4 1.4.
> I have the following in my configure.in:
> AC_CHECK_FUNCS(dlopen, , AC_CHECK_LIB(dl,dlopen, ,
> [AC_MSG_ERROR([
> *** Zen does not function properly without dlopen, sorry.])]))
Y
> "Emil" == Emil Ong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Emil> What is the state of per-object cflags in automake? Is anyone
Emil> working on them? If not, how difficult would it be to implement
Emil> it?
What do you mean by `object'?
We have per-executable and per-library flag support in the mos
Hello, Tom!
> I added another test to pr87.test to check for this failure.
I have fixed it so that it fails "correctly", not because foo/Makefile.in
is tested before being created :-)
Regards,
Pavel Roskin
--- ChangeLog
+++ ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+2001-02-08
>> I added another test to pr87.test to check for this failure.
Pavel> I have fixed it so that it fails "correctly", not because
Pavel> foo/Makefile.in is tested before being created :-)
Duh, thanks. Sometimes I think it is amazing that automake does
anything at all.
Tom
On 8 Feb 2001, Tom Tromey wrote:
> > "Emil" == Emil Ong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Emil> What is the state of per-object cflags in automake? Is anyone
> Emil> working on them? If not, how difficult would it be to implement
> Emil> it?
>
> What do you mean by `object'?
Sorry, I took
Akim --
This line appears twice in the big `if' in &file_contents:
elsif (/$RULE_PATTERN/mso)
What gives? This can't be right.
If the second branch should still live could you add a comment
explaining what case it is for?
Tom
Changelog from CVS HEAD shows that as of Mar 1999, the above options
were removed. Found out the hard way working with CVS autoconf -).
Anyway, build-dir is indeed gone from automake.in, however include-deps
is still present in automake.in.
Along the same lines, both options are still listed in
Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Akim> - print "Copyright 2000 Free Software Foundation, Inc.\n";
> Akim> + print "Copyright 2000, 2001 Free Software Foundation, Inc.\n";
>
> Hmm... shouldn't we print all the copyright years here?
> And in aclocal?
No idea, you are t
Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Akim> This patch includes the Makefile.ins' diffs, i.e., no changes.
>
> Umm, there are plenty of Makefile.in changes here.
Right, and a lot of thanks for reviewing them into the details!
> Some are whitespace changes, which I'd prefer not to change:
>
On Feb 9, 2001, Emil Ong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> prog1_SOURCES = prog.c
> prog1_CFLAGS = -DPROG_NAME=\"prog1\"
> prog2_SOURCES = prog.c
> prog2_CFLAGS = -DPROG_NAME=\"prog2\"
This should work with CVS automake.
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
On Feb 8, 2001, "Florent. Devin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How can I make a Makefile based on automake to be conditionnal
> at make time and not at configure time.
Basically, you can't. This just can't be done with portable Makefile
rules, in general.
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana',
Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I do like the patch. But I'd like these things to be fixed before you
> check it in.
Here is what I checked in. Thanks for noticing!
--
Here is the version I'm applying. The changes
Sorry, I lost track from Tom's message about this.
No changes at all.
Index: ChangeLog
from Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* automake.in (&file_contents): Remove a dead branch.
Index: automake.in
--- automake.in Fri, 09 Feb 2001 04:37:00 +0100 akim (am/f/39_automa
> "Akim" == Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Akim> Here is the version I'm applying. The changes Tom noted were
Akim> due to my writing $pair instead of $pairs. I hope some day we
Akim> really use strict... And prototypes, which will require a lot
Akim> of massage, since it means
> "Akim" == Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Hmm... shouldn't we print all the copyright years here?
>> And in aclocal?
Akim> No idea, you are the Boss :)
That's cheating! What does autoconf do?
Maybe we need to ask RMS.
Tom
> "Akim" == Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Akim> Sorry, I lost track from Tom's message about this.
Akim> No changes at all.
Akim> * automake.in (&file_contents): Remove a dead branch.
Thanks.
Tom
> "Emil" == Emil Ong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Emil> My particular interest is that I'm writing a wrapper program in
Emil> C that changes based on a preprocessor define. I'd like to be
Emil> able to do something like:
Emil> bin_PROGRAMS = prog1 prog2
Emil> prog1_SOURCES = prog.c
Emil> pro
> "Lars" == Lars J Aas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> I believe everything should be in order (I believe I filled out
Lars> for Automake and maybe even Libtool when I did it for Autoconf).
Yeah, I found the info.
Lars> Anyways, the patch should be reworked to use a &canonicalize()
Lars>
26 matches
Mail list logo
