Since this patch is trivial, and since I was wandering around here, I
applied it.
Akim
This test fails with distcheck and not with check. My diagnosis is
that it fails because with distcheck the source tree is read only, and
therefore the `depcomp' which is imported by tests/defs is read only
too:
automake-1.4a/=build/tests % ls -l testSubDir/depcompnostromo 11:10
-r-
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 03:59:31PM +0200, Patrick Guio wrote:
> I try to use the configure tool to build my c++ code. When compiling with
> a DEC/Digital Unix cxx compiler, templates are instantiated in a directory
> called ~/cxx_repository (i.e. *.o files are created in this directory or
> o
On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 10:02:02AM -0700, Ossama Othman wrote:
> ## Clean up template repositories, etc.
> clean-local:
> -rm -rf .rpo ptrepository SunWS_cache Templates.DB
That should have been "*.rpo," but you get the idea. :-)
-Ossama
--
Ossama Othman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Distributed
This patch seems OK to me, but I'd appreciate if Alexandre, Tom, Pavel
or Jim could confirm it's OK.
| Re-resending this patch.
| 2000-06-04 Morten Eriksen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|
| * depcomp: fixed bug in sgi dependency tracking mode with
| sourcecode files which does not contain any dependencies to other
| source files.
Thanks, applied. It looks sane, and you've bee
This guy looks good to me. Any objection?
--
Hello!
"ACLOCAL_AMFLAGS = -I ." causes circular dependencies. The patch fixes
this problem, eliminates an extra occurence of acinclude.m4 and strips
"./" from the remaining macro fi
| Hi,
| this patch implements support for extracting dependency tracking
| information by using the preprocessor mode of the Microsoft Visual
| C/C++ compiler.
Thanks, installed.
Could someone explain to me why we launch it in background and then
just wait for it to complete?
On Oct 16, 2000, Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This guy looks good to me. Any objection?
Nope.
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicampoliv
On Oct 16, 2000, Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | Hi,
> | this patch implements support for extracting dependency tracking
> | information by using the preprocessor mode of the Microsoft Visual
> | C/C++ compiler.
> Thanks, installed.
> Could someone explain to me why we launch it i
On Oct 16, 2000, Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This patch seems OK to me, but I'd appreciate if Alexandre, Tom, Pavel
> or Jim could confirm it's OK.
I have mixed feelings about this. At first, it may sound nice to not
touch pre-existing files. However, think of someone that uses
Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Oct 16, 2000, Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This patch seems OK to me, but I'd appreciate if Alexandre, Tom, Pavel
> > or Jim could confirm it's OK.
>
> I have mixed feelings about this. At first, it may sound nice to not
> touch pr
On Oct 17, 2000, Raja R Harinath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Of course, it would be nice if 'install' in fileutils
> could be extended to provide a --only-if-change option.
Well, there's always move-if-change... But yes, that seems to be the
way to go. We shouldn't change what isn't broken; g
13 matches
Mail list logo
