Re: debbugs and (was: slow "make clean")

2011-02-14 Thread Glenn Morris
Ralf Wildenhues wrote (on Mon, 14 Feb 2011 at 22:02 +0100): > Here's a Debian PR with discussion, and a patch and description: > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=34071#62 > Does that help any (haven't looked closely)? No, that is the initial implementation of the feature that we

Re: debbugs and (was: slow "make clean")

2011-02-14 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Glenn Morris wrote on Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 09:01:24PM CET: > > Ralf Wildenhues wrote (on Sun, 13 Feb 2011 at 19:01 +0100): > > > I glanced over the debbugs documentation at debbugs.gnu.org now, but > > couldn't find a place that said something about subscribing to > > individual bugs. Glen, do

bug#8031: feature request: slow "make clean"

2011-02-13 Thread Ralf Hemmecke
This is a copy of http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake/2011-02/msg00017.html It's not really a bug, but rather a feature request. Ralf Original Message Subject: slow "make clean" Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 23:46:55 +0100 From: Ralf Hemmecke To: automake@

Re: slow "make clean"

2011-02-13 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Sun, 13 Feb 2011, Ralf Hemmecke wrote: I think I would get too many (to me irrelevant) mails if I subscribe to the bug-automake mailing list. That is true, but you don't need to subcribe to the list in order to post to it and it is normal to be Cc:ed on any response. A list moderator mi

Re: debbugs and (was: slow "make clean")

2011-02-13 Thread Glenn Morris
Ralf Wildenhues wrote (on Sun, 13 Feb 2011 at 19:01 +0100): > I glanced over the debbugs documentation at debbugs.gnu.org now, but > couldn't find a place that said something about subscribing to > individual bugs. Glen, do you happen to know more about this? I know that it doesn't work, and pe

debbugs and (was: slow "make clean")

2011-02-13 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Ralf Hemmecke wrote on Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 06:46:12PM CET: > >We have a bug tracker. Just write to the bug-automake list. > >This is documented at > >http://www.gnu.org/software/automake/manual/html_node/Reporting-Bugs.html > > Oh yes, but it's not completely clear to me whether I get only an

Re: slow "make clean"

2011-02-13 Thread Ralf Hemmecke
We have a bug tracker. Just write to the bug-automake list. This is documented at http://www.gnu.org/software/automake/manual/html_node/Reporting-Bugs.html Oh yes, but it's not completely clear to me whether I get only an email for a bug that I submitted or whether I can explicitly can subscri

Re: slow "make clean"

2011-02-13 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
ow, I have to subscribe to automake-patches and try to figure > out when automake will have improvements that fix the slow "make clean" > problem instead of just subscribing to the specific bug report. We have a bug tracker. Just write to the bug-automake list. This is documented at

Re: slow "make clean"

2011-02-13 Thread Ralf Hemmecke
MAKE-generated files? Thanks for the report, No problem. But I was a bit surprised that I haven't found any proper bugtracker. Now, I have to subscribe to automake-patches and try to figure out when automake will have improvements that fix the slow "make clean" problem instead of

Re: slow "make clean"

2011-02-12 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Ralf, * Ralf Hemmecke wrote on Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 11:46:55PM CET: > I've a project that must use subdir-objects, because of filename > clashes in subdirectories (non-recursive build). > The generated Makefile contains a target "mostlyclean-compile" which > has about 1500 lines that look l

slow "make clean"

2011-02-12 Thread Ralf Hemmecke
I've a project that must use subdir-objects, because of filename clashes in subdirectories (non-recursive build). AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE([-Wall -Werror foreign subdir-objects]) I just have lib_LTLIBRARIES = libfoo.la check_PROGRAMS = ${TESTSUITE_TESTS} ${TESTSUITE_XFAIL_TESTS} but quite a lot of fi