On 2011-06-23 16:25 -0400, Jie Zhang wrote:
> > With Posix make Makefiles, it would be doable with some more work, but
> > automake doesn't. With GNU make extensions used in the Makefile.am, it
> > is almost impossible without implementing a large set of GNU make
> > extension parsing in automake
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 4:51 PM, Nick Bowler wrote:
> On 2011-06-23 16:25 -0400, Jie Zhang wrote:
>> > With Posix make Makefiles, it would be doable with some more work, but
>> > automake doesn't. With GNU make extensions used in the Makefile.am, it
>> > is almost impossible without implementing
Hi Ralf,
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Hi Jie,
>
> * Jie Zhang wrote on Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 03:30:43PM CEST:
>> On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 1:52 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>> > The only thing that keeps me from setting current behavior in stone is
>> > that it is sooo uni
Hi Jie,
* Jie Zhang wrote on Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 03:30:43PM CEST:
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 1:52 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > The only thing that keeps me from setting current behavior in stone is
> > that it is sooo unintuitive and ugly.
> >
> There is another ugly way to achieve the same purp
Hi Ralf，
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 1:52 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> * Mike Frysinger wrote on Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 02:08:50AM CEST:
>> http://sources.redhat.com/automake/automake.html#Extending
>> [quote]
>> Note that Automake does not make any distinction between ru
Hi Mike,
* Mike Frysinger wrote on Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 02:08:50AM CEST:
> http://sources.redhat.com/automake/automake.html#Extending
> [quote]
> Note that Automake does not make any distinction between rules with
> commands and rules that only specify dependencies. So it i
i'm working on a project (urjtag) that has yacc/lex files in it. and other
files in the directory depend on the generated output from yacc/lex. so the
automake file looks something like:
libbsdl_la_SOURCES = \
vhdl_bison.y \
bsdl_bison.y \
bsdl.c \
bsdl_se
