Karl Berry wrote:
> https://lists.gnu.org/r/bug-bison/2020-07/msg00042.html
>
> I can understand increasing permissions to allow +rx on installation
> directories, but why force 755, thus disallowing group writability?
> I've never understood this forcing of 755.
As the one who originally br
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 3:03 PM Paul Eggert wrote:
>
> On 7/27/20 2:24 PM, Karl Berry wrote:
> > https://lists.gnu.org/r/bug-bison/2020-07/msg00042.html
> >
> > I can understand increasing permissions to allow +rx on installation
> > directories, but why force 755, thus disallowing group writ
On 7/27/20 2:24 PM, Karl Berry wrote:
https://lists.gnu.org/r/bug-bison/2020-07/msg00042.html
I can understand increasing permissions to allow +rx on installation
directories, but why force 755, thus disallowing group writability?
I've never understood this forcing of 755.
I expect it was
https://lists.gnu.org/r/bug-bison/2020-07/msg00042.html
I can understand increasing permissions to allow +rx on installation
directories, but why force 755, thus disallowing group writability?
I've never understood this forcing of 755.
I don't think Zack plans to release a new Automake.
[Following up on this thread in bug-bison:
https://lists.gnu.org/r/bug-bison/2020-07/msg00042.html
]
On 7/26/20 7:09 AM, Frank Heckenbach wrote:
Maybe he can at least fix the permission problem. This should be a
smaller issue (at least compared to parallel configure).
I don't think Zack plans
