- Original Message -
From: "Akim Demaille" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Alexandre Oliva" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 7:00 PM
Subject: Re: problem: uniti
> "Robert" == Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Robert> Is there are reason that the automate values cannot all be +=,
Robert> with a flag to ignore the value completely if the user uses =
Robert> not += ?
Sorry, I don't understand what you mean.
Robert> Without handling this in th
> "Alexandre" == Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Alexandre> On Apr 18, 2001, Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Unfortunately it is quite unrealistic wrt the implementation:
>> Automake values are read _after_ Makefile.am was. Supporting this
>> would be hard, and I am n
- Original Message -
From: "Akim Demaille" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Alexandre Oliva" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 5:53 PM
Subject: Re: problem: u
On Apr 18, 2001, Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Unfortunately it is quite unrealistic wrt the implementation: Automake
> values are read _after_ Makefile.am was. Supporting this would be
> hard, and I am not sure it would bring really bonus.
How about this: when you find FOO += bar
> "Alexandre" == Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Alexandre> On Apr 17, 2001, Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> * automake.in (¯o_define): User variables can be first defined
>> with `+='.
Alexandre> My impression is that, in this case, the macro should add
Alexandre> to
On Apr 17, 2001, Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * automake.in (¯o_define): User variables can be first defined
> with `+='.
My impression is that, in this case, the macro should add to whatever
automake would have set by default, instead of completely overriding
the setti
> I apply this:
>
> Index: ChangeLog
> from Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * automake.in (¯o_define): User variables can be first defined
> with `+='.
In fact, I don't, because I now recall why I did that. It is related
to pluseq7 which fails with this test, and it wa
| > "Robert" == Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Robert> 3) src/Makefile.am: cf_gen_DEPENDENCIES must be set with `='
| Robert> before using `+='
| >> We recently talked about this with Tom, and we agreed that there is
| >> no reason not to do that (but to protect the user from he
> "Robert" == Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Robert> 3) src/Makefile.am: cf_gen_DEPENDENCIES must be set with `='
Robert> before using `+='
>> We recently talked about this with Tom, and we agreed that there is
>> no reason not to do that (but to protect the user from herself, but
10 matches
Mail list logo
