* Baurzhan Ismagulov wrote on Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 12:57:33PM CET:
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 07:54:34PM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>
> > I suppose to fix TAGS you may need to rename EXTRA_maude_SOURCES to a
> > macro name not specially recognized by automake.
>
> This does eliminate duplicates
Hello Ralf,
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 07:54:34PM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > However, I would really like to avoid duplicating every source file in
> > maude_SOURCES and EXTRA_maude_SOURCES (the necessity to write a custom
> > make clean and duplicated TAGS entries being other minor points).
>
* Baurzhan Ismagulov wrote on Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 04:22:38PM CET:
> This does work:
Good.
> maude_SOURCES = maude/maude.processed.cpp
>
> EXTRA_maude_SOURCES = maude/maude.cpp
>
> .cpp.processed.cpp:
> python $(top_srcdir)/myscript.py $<
> mkdir -p `dirname [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 09:09:39PM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > > What are the input files? If they
> > > have different suffixes than the compiler, you can just use a (suffix)
> > > rule to do the preprocessing. Even if they have suffixes like .c, you
> > > might be able to hack it by writi
Hello Baurzhan,
* Baurzhan Ismagulov wrote on Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 11:10:47AM CET:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 09:34:22PM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > What are the input files? If they
> > have different suffixes than the compiler, you can just use a (suffix)
> > rule to do the preprocessing.
Hello Ralf,
It turned out I'm not subscribed to the list and have missed some
interesting stuff like less verbose.
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 09:34:22PM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > I'd like to migrate a SNiFF+ project to automake. So far, it looks quite
> > promising. Two issues:
> >
> > 1. T
Hello Baurzhan,
* Baurzhan Ismagulov wrote on Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 05:37:58PM CET:
>
> I'd like to migrate a SNiFF+ project to automake. So far, it looks quite
> promising. Two issues:
>
> 1. The compilation rule performs some custom pre-processing before
>actually calling the compiler; if p
Hello,
I'd like to migrate a SNiFF+ project to automake. So far, it looks quite
promising. Two issues:
1. The compilation rule performs some custom pre-processing before
actually calling the compiler; if pre-processing fails, the compiler
is not called, and make is stopped.
2. The Tasking
