Re: pr19.test

2001-05-18 Thread Tom Tromey
>>>>> "Robert" == Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Robert> I went to retest this : I couldn't find pr19.test. pr9, yes, Robert> pr19, no. Is it still in HEAD? Try lex3.test. Tom

Re: pr19.test

2001-05-18 Thread Robert Collins
I went to retest this : I couldn't find pr19.test. pr9, yes, pr19, no. Is it still in HEAD? Rob - Original Message - From: "Tom Tromey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "edward" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; &

Re: pr19.test

2001-05-17 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Robert" == Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Robert> I recall it failing on openBSD 2.8. Cool. Now, how can we fix it? One idea would be to emit `.PRECIOUS: parse.c'. However, I don't know if that will work with a non-GNU make. Would that work on OpenBSD? (I don't have access

RE: pr19.test

2001-05-17 Thread Robert Collins
I recall it failing on openBSD 2.8. Rob

Re: pr19.test

2001-05-17 Thread Tom Tromey
> "edward" == edward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: I'm finally reading this thread. I haven't finished it yet, so what I say may make little sense :-( edward> # FIXME: nodist. edward> &push_dist_common ($pfx . $base . '.' . $ext); edward> commenting out the last line removes foo.

Re: pr19.test

2001-05-13 Thread Tom Tromey
> "edward" == edward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: edward> On systems with make programs which delete intermediate edward> targets (including cygwin), I expect pr19 to fail with foo.c edward> not found. I thought we circumvented this by emitting dependencies so that intermediate files weren't

Re: pr19.test

2001-03-13 Thread Robert Collins
-sh -c -m a+r\ {} {} \; || chmod -R a+r ./am_lex_bug-0.1.1 === end test log Rob Bonus content: ==== make check VERBOSE=e TESTS=pr19.test log ((from cygwin) don't know if it's useful I haven't included the openBSD one, because we're AFAIK we're not chasing a plat

Re: pr19.test

2001-03-13 Thread edward
- Original Message - From: "Akim Demaille" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "edward" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 5:39 AM Subject: Re: pr19.test > Thanks for the details. As I'm currently working

Re: pr19.test

2001-03-13 Thread Akim Demaille
| From | http://sources.redhat.com/ml/automake/2001-03/msg00183.html | | 2) lines 4946-4947 of automake.in version 1.977 | | # FIXME: nodist. | &push_dist_common ($pfx . $base . '.' . $ext); | | commenting out the last line removes foo.c (which is a temporary file) | from the m

Re: pr19.test

2001-03-13 Thread edward
From http://sources.redhat.com/ml/automake/2001-03/msg00183.html 2) lines 4946-4947 of automake.in version 1.977 # FIXME: nodist. &push_dist_common ($pfx . $base . '.' . $ext); commenting out the last line removes foo.c (which is a temporary file) from the make distdir target,

Re: pr19.test

2001-03-13 Thread Akim Demaille
chmod -R a+r ./am_lex_bug-0.1.1 Could you try to find the guilty lines in tests/testSubDir/Makefile? I'd suggest that you make check VERBOSE=e TESTS=pr19.test perl -pi 's/^\t\@/\t/g' testSubDir/Makefile cd testSubDir make distdir And send the logs.

Re: pr19.test

2001-03-12 Thread Robert Collins
My Bad. Sorry about that noise.. correct test log : Rob $ make TESTS=pr19.test check make check-TESTS make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/automake/tests' === Running test ./pr19.test configure.in:8: warning: AC_PROG_LEX invoked multiple times checking for a BSD compatible install...

Re: pr19.test

2001-03-12 Thread edward
hm. pr19.test fails but you post the logs from subdirbuildsources.test :) try: make TESTS=pr19.test check in order to run just pr19.test - Original Message - From: "Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "edward" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "

pr19.test

2001-03-12 Thread Robert Collins
Hi, I've altered pr19.test to be (added VERBOSE=yes, and AC_EXEEXT && AC_OBJEXT). I've tried this test on both openBSD & windows. It's failing on both (unaltered on openBSD as it doesn't have the .exe headache). I'm quite happy to commit some time to trou