Hello Jack,
a few humble ideas:
On Sat, May 03, 2008 at 05:59:44PM -0700, Jack Bates wrote:
> patch: patch-stamp
> patch-stamp: patches/*
> cat patches/* | patch -p0
>
> touch $@
Please note that this rule is not perfect; when one of the
patches is deleted, the rule does not notice
Jack Bates wrote:
> I created a "patch" rule in our application Makefile.am for applying
> these patches:
>
> patch: patch-stamp
> patch-stamp: patches/*
> cat patches/* | patch -p0
>
> touch $@
It seems to me like this would break VPATH builds since it assumes
you're building i
We are developing an application using a framework. Both the application
and the framework are maintained using Subversion. The Subversion
repository for the application defines a Subversion "external" for the
framework:
http://svnbook.red-bean.com/nightly/en/svn.advanced.externals.html
This saves
