On Sat, 2003-12-20 at 00:41, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
> >>> "Robert" == Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> [...]
>
> Robert> It transforms macros and paths in an included file (called
> Robert> Makefile.rules for now) , to make them suitable for a non-recursive
> Robert> build.
>>> "Robert" == Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
Robert> It transforms macros and paths in an included file (called
Robert> Makefile.rules for now) , to make them suitable for a non-recursive
Robert> build.
I'm skeptical about whether this approach can be made to work
intuitiv
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 07:52:37PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
> It transforms macros and paths in an included file (called
> Makefile.rules for now) , to make them suitable for a non-recursive
> build.
>
> As show by the test cases, this allows a couple of neat things:
> 1) A stub Makefile.am
>
Well, I finally snuck in a little time to update my proof of concept for
non recursive includes.
Still, I don't code perl - and it shows ;).
How to use?
Grab CVS automake, apply thepatch, drop the test files into tests
subdir.
Have a look at the test cases to see how to use it.
What does it do