[re-adding automake list, as this mail might be of interest for its readers]
On Monday 30 May 2011, Graham Reitz wrote:
> Excellent. Thanks again Stefano.
>
> I can clone the git depository directly.
>
> I saw a cvs link. cvs -d
> :pserver:anonym...@pserver.git.sv.gnu.org:/automake.git \ che
Awesome. Thanks Stefano.
I will try it this morning (CST) and report back.
Graham
Sent from my iPhone
On May 29, 2011, at 5:51 AM, Stefano Lattarini
wrote:
> [Adding automake-patches]
>
> On Saturday 28 May 2011, Graham Reitz wrote:
>> Hi Stefano,
>>
>> Did you have a chance to take a
[dropping automake-patches]
On Sunday 29 May 2011, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> [Adding automake-patches]
>
> On Saturday 28 May 2011, Graham Reitz wrote:
> > Hi Stefano,
> >
> > Did you have a chance to take a look at the config and test logs?
> > (they are attached)
> >
> > I've been trying to f
[Adding automake-patches]
On Saturday 28 May 2011, Graham Reitz wrote:
> Hi Stefano,
>
> Did you have a chance to take a look at the config and test logs?
> (they are attached)
>
> I've been trying to figure it out without much success.
>
I think I've found the problem: the `aclocal.in' and `auto
Thanks for the help. Here is the requested information:
> Could you please post also the `config.log' generated by configur
config.log:
config.log
Description: Binary data
> and the results of the following commands:
>
> $HOME/root/usr/local/bin/autoconf --version
> $HOME/root/usr/local
[listhelper note: At 1.0M the original message was very large for the
mailing lists. I gzip'd it to 33K and re-sent it. --Bob Proulx]
> Did you copy-paste that line?
Yea, copy/paste error when I manually removed the full path.
> Could you please post the resulting `test-suite.log'? It's hard
On Tuesday 24 May 2011, Graham Reitz wrote:
> > Did you copy-paste that line?
>
> Yea, copy/paste error when I manually removed the full path.
>
> > Could you please post the resulting `test-suite.log'? It's hard
> > to tell what's going on without more information ...
>
>
> Absolutely, I didn'
Den 2011-05-24 07:43 skrev Graham Reitz:
> After a successful build, make check yields:
>
> =
> 628 of 650 tests failed
> (79 tests were not run)
> See tests/test-suite.log
> Please report to bug-autom...@gnu.org
> =
> make[3]
On Tuesday 24 May 2011, Graham Reitz wrote:
> After a successful build, make check yields:
>
> =
> 628 of 650 tests failed
>
Ouch.
> (79 tests were not run)
> See tests/test-suite.log
> Please report to bug-autom...@gnu.org
> ===
After a successful build, make check yields:
=
628 of 650 tests failed
(79 tests were not run)
See tests/test-suite.log
Please report to bug-autom...@gnu.org
=
make[3]: *** [test-suite.log] Error 1
make[2]: *** [check-TESTS] E
On Thu, Jul 25, 2002 at 11:21:31PM +0200, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
> patrick> - comment6 needs gnu make
> >>
> >> Which make are you using? I'd rather teach Automake to warn
> >> about this construct if it's not portable.
>
> It turns out it was easier to fix the user input rather than t
patrick> - comment6 needs gnu make
>>
>> Which make are you using? I'd rather teach Automake to warn
>> about this construct if it's not portable.
It turns out it was easier to fix the user input rather than to
warn about it. I'm installing the following patch on HEAD and
branch-1-6.
I th
>>> "Tom" == Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "adl" == Alexandre Duret-Lutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
adl> The gnits2 and gnits3 failures show a difference between GNU
adl> make and BSD make when run with the `-k' option: GNU make will
adl> reflect whether it encountered an err
> "adl" == Alexandre Duret-Lutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
adl> The gnits2 and gnits3 failures show a difference between GNU
adl> make and BSD make when run with the `-k' option: GNU make will
adl> reflect whether it encountered an error in it's exit status
adl> while BSD make will always su
>>> "Patrick" == Patrick Welche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
>> env TESTS='gnits2.test gnits3.test obsolete.test' VERBOSE=x make -e check
Patrick> .. and here it is.
Thanks. I'm installing the following patch. It should fix
these three failures.
The gnits2 and gnits3 failures show
On Tue, Jul 23, 2002 at 06:32:34PM +0200, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
>
> What environment is `me'?
Ooops - NetBSD-1.6D/i386
> Cleaning configure.lino in distclean is correct, but not
> autom4te.cache. See the comment about this a few lines below
> the place you patched.
Ah yes..
> patrick
Hi,
>>> "Patrick" == Patrick Welche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Patrick> Some "make check" tests failed for me.. Essentially
What environment is `me'?
Patrick> - libtool3, subobj9, subpkg do a distcheck, which finds autoconf's
Patrick> configure.lineno left over. Presumably autom4te.cache
Some "make check" tests failed for me.. Essentially
- libtool3, subobj9, subpkg do a distcheck, which finds autoconf's
configure.lineno left over. Presumably autom4te.cache should also
get distcleaned away?
- comment6 needs gnu make
- still don't know what's wrong with gnits2 and gnits3 (prob
18 matches
Mail list logo
