hi,
Alex Hornby:
> All makes I've come across use -q for "Question" and -s for "Silent".
> Can you give a counter example?
>
> Alex.
earlier in the thread ``Lars J. Aas'' stated that -q on IRIX make
means quiet. i've just checked that an this is wrong (Lars also
posted a message correcting thi
xample of a make where -q means quiet?
Sorry, I said that (IRIX make). I didn't find a manpage, and interpreted
the lack of output when I did a "make -q" as quiet mode. After digging
around I found the manpage:
| -q Return a zero exit value if the target file is up-to
Sascha Demetrio writes:
>
> I think the more interesting question is: Does ``make -q'' the same thing
> on all platforms? I've seen -q for ``Quiet mode'' and -q for ``Question
> mode'' (i.e. check if the target is up-to-date without buildin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sascha Demetrio) writes:
> I've seen -q for ``Quiet mode'' and -q for ``Question mode''
> (i.e. check if the target is up-to-date without building it).
Care to give an example of a make where -q means quiet?
The historically interested can note what Stuart Feldman's 7th editi
;
I think the more interesting question is: Does ``make -q'' the same thing
on all platforms? I've seen -q for ``Quiet mode'' and -q for ``Question
mode'' (i.e. check if the target is up-to-date without building it).
solong,
Sascha
Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You may want to ask Michael Sokolov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, the
> current maintainer of 4.3BSD. If it works on 4.3BSD, it can
> probably work anywhere :-)
3BSD had it.
/Johan
> Is make -q portable? If so I could speed up my parallel built source
> patch somewhat.
SunOS 4.1.3 has it.
--Robert
--
Robert S. Maier | Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dept. of Math.|
Univ. of Arizona | FAX: +1 520 621 8322
Tucson, AZ 85721 | Voice: +1 520 621 6892 (depa
On Fri, Jun 30, 2000 at 11:51:06AM -0500, Michael Bletzinger wrote:
: > > > Is make -q portable?
: > >
: > > I don't think so.
: >
: > It is present on GNU Make, Solaris 2.6 make and HP-UX 10.20 make (all
: > the platforms I currently have access to). C
Alex Hornby wrote:
>
> Alexandre Oliva writes:
> > On Jun 30, 2000, Alex Hornby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Is make -q portable?
> >
> > I don't think so.
> >
>
> It is present on GNU Make, Solaris 2.6 make and HP
On Jun 30, 2000, Alex Hornby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alexandre Oliva writes:
>> On Jun 30, 2000, Alex Hornby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > Is make -q portable?
>>
>> I don't think so.
> It is present on GNU Make, Solaris 2.6 ma
Alexandre Oliva writes:
> On Jun 30, 2000, Alex Hornby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Is make -q portable?
>
> I don't think so.
>
It is present on GNU Make, Solaris 2.6 make and HP-UX 10.20 make (all
the platforms I currently have access to). Could you
On Jun 30, 2000, Alex Hornby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is make -q portable?
I don't think so.
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-U
> Is make -q portable? If so I could speed up my parallel built source
> patch somewhat.
All systems I have access to, plus the *BSDs support it.
System 7 doesn't, but maybe someone can find an example
closer to reality, maybe Ultrix ;-)
Is make -q portable? If so I could speed up my parallel built source
patch somewhat.
Alex.
14 matches
Mail list logo
