> "Jim" == Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jim> Here's the patch you've seen at least twice before. Yeah, yeah,
Jim> I know that there was some discussion about alternate (more
Jim> invasive?) plans to fix the problem, but in the mean time, how
Jim> about this one:
Thanks for the r
Here's the patch you've seen at least twice before.
Yeah, yeah, I know that there was some discussion about
alternate (more invasive?) plans to fix the problem, but
in the mean time, how about this one:
Any objections?
Index: m4/strip.m4
==
