Hello,
I am amazed at how much noise this question has generated.
* Bob Rossi wrote on Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 05:57:59PM CET:
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 11:51:56AM -0500, Peter Johansson wrote:
> > Warren Young wrote:
> >> Bob Rossi wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I was
On Thu, 22 Jan 2009, Warren Young wrote:
rsync doesn't use timestamps. It looks at the entire file contents for both
source and target, and performs some pretty hefty computation on them. Thus,
it only gives a speedup when copying files over a slow link between two
machines. It's great ove
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
Perhaps the solution is to use an 'install' program which only copies
files if they have changed. Rsync is an example of a program which can
do this.
rsync doesn't use timestamps. It looks at the entire file contents for
both source and target, and performs some pre
Bob Rossi wrote:
O, very nice. I think I'll beta test that for you guys. Do you happen
to know how a user could get that feature working off the top of your
head?
I'm just a user and don't know how the feature is supposed to be used.
Changelog refers to this thread
http://lists.gnu.org/archi
On Thu, 22 Jan 2009, Bob Rossi wrote:
It doesn't take very long for you perhaps. On my mingw configuration it
takes very long. Perhaps 1-2 minutes. The executables tend to get very
very large with debug enabled and the copy is slow.
I feel your pain. :-)
Perhaps the solution is to use an 'ins
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 11:51:56AM -0500, Peter Johansson wrote:
> Warren Young wrote:
>> Bob Rossi wrote:
>>>
>>> I was wondering if there is an incremental make install command? (my
>>> make install doesn't appear to be incremental, should it be?)
>&
Warren Young wrote:
Bob Rossi wrote:
I was wondering if there is an incremental make install command? (my
make install doesn't appear to be incremental, should it be?)
No, a Makefile's install target normally just contains a series of
commands for installing everything, without c
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 09:34:52AM -0700, Warren Young wrote:
> Bob Rossi wrote:
>>
>> I was wondering if there is an incremental make install command? (my
>> make install doesn't appear to be incremental, should it be?)
>
> No, a Makefile's install targ
Bob Rossi wrote:
I was wondering if there is an incremental make install command?
(my make install doesn't appear to be incremental, should it be?)
No, a Makefile's install target normally just contains a series of
commands for installing everything, without checking if it ex
Hi,
I was wondering if there is an incremental make install command?
(my make install doesn't appear to be incremental, should it be?)
Thanks,
Bob Rossi
10 matches
Mail list logo
