On Wednesday 07 December 2011, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> On Tuesday 06 December 2011, Adam Spiers wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> > >> Adam Spiers wrote:
> > >> If you attached the new HTML I could probably have a quick look
> > >> in my browser.
> > >>
> > >
On Tuesday 06 December 2011, Adam Spiers wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> >> Adam Spiers wrote:
> >> If you attached the new HTML I could probably have a quick look
> >> in my browser.
> >>
> > But since you volunteer ;-) ... here it is.
>
> FWIW, looks good to
http://www.gnu.org/software/automake/ has several broken links, all
pointing to sources.redhat.com.
It seems that related issues were flagged before:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake/2011-07/msg00042.html
I had to guess my way to https://lists.gnu.org in order to find the lists.
> "Rob" == Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Rob> There's no link to the sources.redhat.com/automake site at the
Rob> project page on gnu.org. IMO such a link would be helpful.
Yes, it would. As far as I know, I have no control over this web
page. Try reporting it to the GNU webma
There's no link to the sources.redhat.com/automake site at the project
page on gnu.org. IMO such a link would be helpful.
Rob
