Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 01:09:21PM +0200, Markus Werle wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Though I appreciate the automatic dependency tracking mechanism,
> > I sometimes encounter problems with this approach using Intel's C++
> > compiler. For reasons I do not understand prefixe
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 01:09:21PM +0200, Markus Werle wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Though I appreciate the automatic dependency tracking mechanism,
> I sometimes encounter problems with this approach using Intel's C++
> compiler. For reasons I do not understand prefixed objects get rebuilt,
> so either depcom
Hi!
Though I appreciate the automatic dependency tracking mechanism,
I sometimes encounter problems with this approach using Intel's C++
compiler. For reasons I do not understand prefixed objects get rebuilt,
so either depcomp cannot properly deal with Intel's Compiler (which is
handled as if it w
