hi :)
On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 05:51:40PM +0200, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
> The only think holding this patch is that it adds a new language
> without documenting it.
I merged Ralfs and my patch and also added a minimal bit of
documentation:
Index: automake.in
>>> "Martin" == Martin Waitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
Martin> And somebody should take a look at other compilers, too.
Speaking of these... does anybody know about some C compiler
that compiles *.s files and does not support both `-c -o' at the
same time? In other words, the `compile'
>>> "Ralf" == Ralf Corsepius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ralf> On Wed, 2004-09-22 at 17:06, Martin Waitz wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm working on a project which uses assembler files which get
>> preprocessed by the C preprocessor (.S files).
>> automake does not yet keep track of dependencies of
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004, Martin Waitz wrote:
hi :)
On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 10:50:19AM -0500, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
How well does this patch work for filesystems which do not preserve
case in file names?
I guess the patch doesn't change the situation here.
Mixed case filenames on such filesystems have
On Fri, 2004-09-24 at 09:58, Martin Waitz wrote:
> But perhaps you are right and we should not separate handling of .s and .S.
I strongly concur.
*.s and *.S are different beasts.
Filesystems and systems which can not distinguish them, have lost.
But this is not an automake problem, this is desi
hi :)
On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 10:50:19AM -0500, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> How well does this patch work for filesystems which do not preserve
> case in file names?
I guess the patch doesn't change the situation here.
Mixed case filenames on such filesystems have always been a problem.
This patch
How well does this patch work for filesystems which do not preserve
case in file names? Do we need to support filesystems which don't
preserve case?
Bob
On Wed, 22 Sep 2004, Martin Waitz wrote:
Hi,
I'm working on a project which uses assembler files which get
preprocessed by the C preprocessor
On Wed, 2004-09-22 at 17:06, Martin Waitz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm working on a project which uses assembler files which get
> preprocessed by the C preprocessor (.S files).
> automake does not yet keep track of dependencies of these files.
Reminds me about my patch
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/
Hi,
I'm working on a project which uses assembler files which get
preprocessed by the C preprocessor (.S files).
automake does not yet keep track of dependencies of these files.
The patch below fixes that for me.
===
diff -urp a
