Ralf Wildenhues wrote on 2010/01/28 07:06:01:
>
> * Joakim Tjernlund wrote on Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 09:08:16AM CET:
> > Ralf Wildenhues wrote on 2010/01/27 08:08:09:
> > >
> > > No. When automake cannot see a literal in a *_LDADD or *_LIBADD
> > > statement, it cannot interpolate it to the respect
* Joakim Tjernlund wrote on Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 09:08:16AM CET:
> Ralf Wildenhues wrote on 2010/01/27 08:08:09:
> >
> > No. When automake cannot see a literal in a *_LDADD or *_LIBADD
> > statement, it cannot interpolate it to the respective *_DEPENDENCIES
> > variable: non-literal content might
Ralf Wildenhues wrote on 2010/01/27 08:08:09:
>
> Hello Joakim,
>
> * Joakim Tjernlund wrote on Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 02:20:24PM CET:
> >
> > I got this rule in Makfile.am:
> > ldadds_false = $(ldadds_cuappl)
> > ldadds_true = $(ldadds_culess)
> >
> > common_LDADD += $(ldad...@cu_less@)
> >
> >
Hello Joakim,
* Joakim Tjernlund wrote on Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 02:20:24PM CET:
>
> I got this rule in Makfile.am:
> ldadds_false = $(ldadds_cuappl)
> ldadds_true = $(ldadds_culess)
>
> common_LDADD += $(ldad...@cu_less@)
>
> @CU_LESS@ is either true or false.
>
> $(ldad...@cu_less@) is omit
I got this rule in Makfile.am:
ldadds_false = $(ldadds_cuappl)
ldadds_true = $(ldadds_culess)
common_LDADD += $(ldad...@cu_less@)
@CU_LESS@ is either true or false.
$(ldad...@cu_less@) is omitted in am__DEPENDENCIES_1 so
if any lib mentioned in ldadds_cuappl or ldadds_culess changes
no rebui
