Re: config.guess comments from our sysadmins

2006-08-12 Thread Russ Allbery
Bob Friesenhahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > New platforms are introduced very slowly (and more slowly every year). This is not my experience. I have to update config.{sub,guess} for a new platform at user request at least once a year, whereas changed platform names have never caused a problem

Re: config.guess comments from our sysadmins

2006-08-12 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Sat, 12 Aug 2006, Bob Proulx wrote: I think someone reading your response will then be scared to update the config.guess because you say it breaks a matched set. But I think that fear is unwarranted and in most cases the script *must* be updated in order to work on new platforms. New platf

Re: config.guess comments from our sysadmins

2006-08-12 Thread Bob Proulx
Bob Friesenhahn wrote: > It may be considered a good thing to some, but it is not necessarily a > good thing. Consider that the rest of the build package (e.g. > libtool) is expecting particular host identifications and that > sometimes the behavior of these scripts change. Only very rarely wi

Re: config.guess comments from our sysadmins

2006-08-12 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Sat, 12 Aug 2006, Bob Proulx wrote: The point of this is that automatically updating the config.guess and config.sub scripts is considered a good thing. It may be considered a good thing to some, but it is not necessarily a good thing. Consider that the rest of the build package (e.g. li

Re: config.guess comments from our sysadmins

2006-08-11 Thread Bob Proulx
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Ed Hartnett wrote: > > Ralf Wildenhues writes: > > > It's safe to just replace the two files with newer versions; I think you > > > should keep the two in sync though. I thought I would note that both Debian and Red Hat packaging of programs that use config.guess and con

Re: config.guess comments from our sysadmins

2006-08-09 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
[ config.guess and config.sub ] * Ed Hartnett wrote on Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 08:19:29PM CEST: > Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > It's safe to just replace the two files with newer versions; I think you > > should keep the two in sync though. > > OK. Should I replace them in ever

Re: config.guess comments from our sysadmins

2006-08-09 Thread Ed Hartnett
Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * Ed Hartnett wrote on Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 07:22:40PM CEST: >> Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > * John Wohlbier wrote on Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 04:12:57PM CEST: >> > http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/~checkout~/config/config/config.gue