Hi Peter,
Peter Ekberg wrote:
>
> Here's my current diff from libtool cvs head. I have been buried
> in work lately so I have not tested it in a while. Use at your
> own risk and all that...
>
Many thanx.
Harri
Hi Harald,
Harald Dunkel wrote on Friday, November 18, 2005 11:01 CEST:
> Hi Peter,
>
> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >
> > You may search the archives of the libtool-patches mailing
> list for the
> > dozens of mails Peter Ekberg has written to support all of
> this nicely,
> > including static an
Hi Peter,
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>
> You may search the archives of the libtool-patches mailing list for the
> dozens of mails Peter Ekberg has written to support all of this nicely,
> including static and shared libraries, the libtool part of "-c -o"
> support, C++ source file names, flags for l
Hi Ralf,
Unfortunately, I haven't gotten around to final testing and applying all
of his patches. I can't promise when I'll be able to do that, but I
certainly would like to see it applied; all I definitely want to avoid
is any regressions for other systems (non-MSVC w32, or non-w32). Nobody
Hi Harald,
* Harald Dunkel wrote on Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 09:05:47AM CET:
>
> There might be yet another problem with supporting msvc: Bill's
> libraries are not built by 'ar cru', either. AFAIK they have
> to be built using link.exe, e.g.
>
> link.exe /lib /OUT:libmylib.lib foo.obj bar.obj
