Alexandre,
thanks for your help.
Is version 1.5 stable enough, to handle big packages also?
Marko
> Am Fre, 2001-12-21 um 10.12 schrieb Marko Mlinar:
> > Alexandre,
> >
> > thanks for your help.
> > Is version 1.5 stable enough, to handle big packages also?
> You dare to ask ? :)
ups, sorry wrong list ;)
> Actually it depends on various factors, but generally speaking yes, it's
> not much mo
Am Fre, 2001-12-21 um 10.12 schrieb Marko Mlinar:
> Alexandre,
>
> thanks for your help.
> Is version 1.5 stable enough, to handle big packages also?
You dare to ask ? :)
Actually it depends on various factors, but generally speaking yes, it's
not much more risky than using other versions of aut
On Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 08:33:25AM +0100, Marko Mlinar wrote:
> Makefile.am:
> bin_PROGRAMS=a
> a_SOURCES=a.c
> a_CFLAGS=-DXXX
> automake --version:
> automake (GNU automake) 1.4
>
> And it does not work. I've searched the Makefile, and it contains only one
> occurence of "a_CFLAGS".
> Am I doin
> >>> "Marko" == Marko Mlinar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [...]
> Marko> The problem is, each test should be compiled with different
defines
> [...]
> Marko> Basically I would need something like prog_CFLAGS.
>
> I think something like this should work:
>
> TESTS = foo bar ...
> EXTRA_PROGRAMS
>>> "Marko" == Marko Mlinar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
Marko> The problem is, each test should be compiled with different defines
[...]
Marko> Basically I would need something like prog_CFLAGS.
I think something like this should work:
TESTS = foo bar ...
EXTRA_PROGRAMS = foo bar ...
foo
Hi!
I am trying to make automated testbench using autoconf & automake.
The problem is, each test should be compiled with different defines (e.g.
using -D
commandline parameter to gcc). Is it possible to do this? I was not able to
find this
in the manual.
Basically I would need something like pr
