Akim Demaille wrote:
> But I hear your point, I just beg to differ on the relative
> importance.
I tend to agree. It's more important to make automake support po/ directories
in an easier way _in_general_ (and get rid of gettextize). A proposal in this
direction is at http://mail.gnu.org/archive/h
> Hi,
> Akim Demaille wrote:
>> > It is possible to do the internationalization in such a way, that
>> > automake would still run without libintl-perl being installed.
>> > License problems should not be an issue, libintl-perl is distributed
>> > under the LGPL. As for the required Perl ver
Hi,
Akim Demaille wrote:
> It is possible to do the internationalization in such a way, that
> automake would still run without libintl-perl being installed.
> License problems should not be an issue, libintl-perl is distributed
> under the LGPL. As for the required Perl version, Perl 5.004 i
> Hi,
> beginning with version 0.13, GNU gettext has full support for Perl
> scripts, with libintl-perl (http://search.cpan.org/dist/libintl-perl/)
> there is a stable runtime environment for gettext like message
> translation in Perl, and with yours truly there is somebody available
> that
Hi,
beginning with version 0.13, GNU gettext has full support for Perl
scripts, with libintl-perl (http://search.cpan.org/dist/libintl-perl/)
there is a stable runtime environment for gettext like message
translation in Perl, and with yours truly there is somebody available
that would voluntee
