Well, the ccache project page (ccache.samba.org) says ccache is based
on compilercache:
"The idea came from Erik Thiele [,who] wrote the original
compilercache program as a bourne shell script. ccache is a
re-implementation of Erik's idea in C with more features and better
performance."
Then the
Dalibor Topic wrote:
O
If you're building C/C++ code, check out ccache and distcc as well.
Thanks for the tip. While researching ccache I found compilercache.
Can anyone comment on the relative merits of this wrt ccache?
Thanks,
Jim.
Hi,
Am Mon, 3 Jul 2006 08:13:50 -0700
schrieb Dalibor Topic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 02:43:02PM +0200, Thomas Porschberg wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > do Makefiles created from automake benefit from dualcore CPUs
> > and is the build process speeded up ?
>
> that'd seem to be mo
Hi,
Thomas Porschberg schrieb:
> do Makefiles created from automake benefit from dualcore CPUs
> and is the build process speeded up ?
Most Makefiles generated from automake are SMP safe and benefit from
multiple processors if make's -j option is used. They usually also
benefit from -j2 on sing
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 02:43:02PM +0200, Thomas Porschberg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> do Makefiles created from automake benefit from dualcore CPUs
> and is the build process speeded up ?
that'd seem to be more of a question about the make tool you're using to
process the makefiles. GNU make has the -j o
Hi,
do Makefiles created from automake benefit from dualcore CPUs
and is the build process speeded up ?
Are there any measurement data available ?
(Background is that I plan to buy a new PC and would like to know if it
is worthwhile to consider such a system.)
Regards,
Thomas
--
