On 26 May 2001, Tom Tromey wrote:
> If there is a case I've missed I am willing to address it. But I
> don't see one right now. Do you have a concrete bug produced by the
> current code?
I've checked a snapshot taken at night today and it's fine. Thanks a
lot.
--
+ Maciej W. Rozycki, Tec
> "Maciej" == Maciej W Rozycki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Maciej> This fixes the configure-time error, indeed, but is it
Maciej> correct? I believe dependencies should only be controlled by
Maciej> the "no-dependencies" setting in AUTOMAKE_OPTIONS and thus my
Maciej> fix is correct and your
On 23 May 2001, Tom Tromey wrote:
> I think this patch fixed the problem:
>
> 2001-05-17 Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * m4/depend.m4 (AM_DEPENDENCIES): If depcomp doesn't exist, revert
> to no dependency tracking.
>
> I'm guessing you forgot to run aclocal.
Nope, I have a
> "Maciej" == Maciej W Rozycki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Maciej> The AM_DEPENDENCIES macro invokes depcomp, so I think it's
Maciej> appropriate to copy the program whenever the macro is used as
Maciej> a part of the configure script and not only when DEP_FILES is
Maciej> non-empty.
I think
Hi,
The current version of automake does not link/copy depcomp when invoked
with the --add-missing option even if it is required by the configure
script. The AM_DEPENDENCIES macro invokes depcomp, so I think it's
appropriate to copy the program whenever the macro is used as a part of
the confi
