Hello Eric, Steffen,
long ago:
* Eric Blake wrote on Mon, May 17, 2010 at 08:08:05PM CEST:
> On 05/17/2010 12:02 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > * Eric Blake wrote on Sat, May 15, 2010 at 01:41:08AM CEST:
> >> Right now, either you use foo_DEPENDENCIES and have to list everything
> >> yourself, or
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> adding of another variable to the default list of
> foo_DEPENDENCIES. I guess. Suggestions for naming such a variable?
foo_EXTRA_DEPS?
oki,
Steffen
On 05/17/2010 12:02 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> * Eric Blake wrote on Sat, May 15, 2010 at 01:41:08AM CEST:
>> Right now, either you use foo_DEPENDENCIES and have to list everything
>> yourself, or you omit it, and automake does a good job. But what about
>> the case where you want
Hi Eric,
* Eric Blake wrote on Sat, May 15, 2010 at 01:41:08AM CEST:
> Right now, either you use foo_DEPENDENCIES and have to list everything
> yourself, or you omit it, and automake does a good job. But what about
> the case where you want automake to do its automatic dependencies, and
> then yo
I just caused a build regression in libvirt because of my
misunderstanding about dependencies.
Right now, either you use foo_DEPENDENCIES and have to list everything
yourself, or you omit it, and automake does a good job. But what about
the case where you want automake to do its automatic depende
