Re: a general question about config.h files

2003-04-04 Thread Ronald Landheer-Cieslak
On Wed, 2 Apr 2003, Dale E Martin wrote: > > > "make install" clutils is installing it's generated config.h, which has > > ^ > > Don't do that. > Meaning that none of my headers can #inlude "config.h"? That seems > ludicrous to me. OK..

Re: a general question about config.h files

2003-04-02 Thread Dale E Martin
> > "make install" clutils is installing it's generated config.h, which has > ^ > Don't do that. Meaning that none of my headers can #inlude "config.h"? That seems ludicrous to me. > You shouldn't install config.h: they are not meant

Re: a general question about config.h files

2003-04-02 Thread Ronald Landheer-Cieslak
On Mon, 31 Mar 2003, Dale E Martin wrote: > Am I not getting some fundamental concept of the intention of config.h > files? Yep - see below. > Here's my problem; I've got several projects that depend on each other; > several libraries that depend on each other in an orderly fashion. All of > them

a general question about config.h files

2003-03-31 Thread Dale E Martin
Am I not getting some fundamental concept of the intention of config.h files? Here's my problem; I've got several projects that depend on each other; several libraries that depend on each other in an orderly fashion. All of them are using autotools for their build systems. One of the libraries i