Re: _SOURCES variable, files that are not translation units

2005-12-09 Thread Stepan Kasal
Hello, On Thu, 8 Dec 2005, Mike Mattie wrote: > The _SOURCES variable makes a poor assumption, that the .c files > listed are translation units. It is permissable though uncommon to > create .c files that are included into a translation unit to break up > a source file for organizational purposes.

Re: _SOURCES variable, files that are not translation units

2005-12-09 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 04:28:21AM CET: > On Thu, 8 Dec 2005, Mike Mattie wrote: > > > >The _SOURCES variable makes a poor assumption, that the .c files > >listed are translation units. > > A work-around is that you can rename your included .c files to use the > extension

Re: _SOURCES variable, files that are not translation units

2005-12-08 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Thu, 8 Dec 2005, Mike Mattie wrote: automake mailing list, The _SOURCES variable makes a poor assumption, that the .c files listed are translation units. It is permissable though uncommon to create .c files that are included into a translation unit to break up a source file for organizationa

_SOURCES variable, files that are not translation units

2005-12-08 Thread Mike Mattie
automake mailing list, The _SOURCES variable makes a poor assumption, that the .c files listed are translation units. It is permissable though uncommon to create .c files that are included into a translation unit to break up a source file for organizational purposes. Automake's assumption about th