> You can['t?] have a configure substitution in _SOURCES. I know this seems
> wrong. It is unfortunate that 1.4 doesn't complain about this (1.5
> will).
Why is that? Can it be fixed?
> Instead you have to play tricks with _LDADD if you want to go the
> configure substitution route.
I wasn't
On Mar 31, 2000, Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> what do people think about using FAQ-O-Matic for Automake?
Would be great
--
Alexandre OlivaEnjoy Guaraná, see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Cygnus Solutions, a Red Hat companyaoliva@{redhat, cygnus}.com
Free Software Deve
Sam> The basic problem is that source is conditionally compiled into
Sam> SDL, and supposedly the attached code is supposed to do the
Sam> "right thing", but I can't get it to include rules for the
Sam> objects. I can get the desired effect using automake
Sam> conditionals, but the complexity of
I've been banging my head against automake.
The basic problem is that source is conditionally compiled into SDL, and
supposedly the attached code is supposed to do the "right thing", but I
can't get it to include rules for the objects. I can get the desired
effect using automake conditionals, but
