On Thu, 2006-09-28 at 13:06 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Hello Ryan,
>
> * Ryan McDougall wrote on Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 11:30:32AM CEST:
> > On Thu, 2006-09-28 at 18:23 +0900, Ryan McDougall wrote:
> > >
> > > How can I either
> > > 1. Express to automake the correct dependancy
>
> By writing
* Ryan McDougall wrote on Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 11:23:10AM CEST:
>
> I am currently attempting to use a version of this (non-recursive)
> method. I am avoiding exactly what you wrote since I need to pass
> specific -D options to different packages without using libA_CPPFLAGS =
> -DFORLIBFOO -DFORLI
Hello Ryan,
* Ryan McDougall wrote on Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 11:30:32AM CEST:
> On Thu, 2006-09-28 at 18:23 +0900, Ryan McDougall wrote:
> >
> > How can I either
> > 1. Express to automake the correct dependancy
By writing
libA_la_LIBADD = libfoo.la
instead of
libA_la_LIBADD = -L. -lfoo
> I
On Thu, 2006-09-28 at 18:23 +0900, Ryan McDougall wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-09-22 at 04:34 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > * Ryan McDougall wrote on Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 02:54:21AM CEST:
> > > On Thu, 2006-09-21 at 13:32 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > > > * Ryan McDougall wrote on Thu, Sep 21, 200
On Fri, 2006-09-22 at 04:34 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Ryan McDougall wrote on Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 02:54:21AM CEST:
> > On Thu, 2006-09-21 at 13:32 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > > * Ryan McDougall wrote on Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 11:40:37AM CEST:
> > > 2) If you prefer nonrecursive makefi
* Ryan McDougall wrote on Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 04:51:41AM CEST:
> On Fri, 2006-09-22 at 04:34 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >
> > The Libtool manual has more details about this (but it's arguably a bit
> > cryptic about convenience archives). I'm not sure what you need to
> > know.
>
> Since I
On Fri, 2006-09-22 at 04:34 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > >
> > > You should keep in mind that the convenience archives will end up in
> > > total (i.e., all their symbols, not just needed ones) in the resulting
> > > module.
> >
> > This is a good point, thank you. Do you have any more info
* Ryan McDougall wrote on Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 04:10:40AM CEST:
>
> The problem with this is that with this method that I have to manually
> specify the dependencies, right?
>
> A: foo
> cd src/A && $(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) libA.la
> .PHONY: A
>
> foo:
> cd src/foo && $(MAKE) $(AM_M
* Ryan McDougall wrote on Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 02:54:21AM CEST:
> On Thu, 2006-09-21 at 13:32 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > * Ryan McDougall wrote on Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 11:40:37AM CEST:
> > >
> > 1) If you prefer recursive makefiles then you can have each directory
> > create one (or a numbe
On Thu, 2006-09-21 at 13:32 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>
> The second approach will enable you to
> make libA.la
>
> in the toplevel directory. Otherwise, there is nothing that prevents
> you from adding your own targets a la
> A:
> cd src/A && $(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) libA.la
>
On Thu, 2006-09-21 at 13:32 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Hello Ryan,
>
> * Ryan McDougall wrote on Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 11:40:37AM CEST:
> >
> > Im porting a large code-base from windows to linux, and attempting to
> > use autotools to do so. The code in SVN is essentially one big tree of
> >
Hello Ryan,
* Ryan McDougall wrote on Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 11:40:37AM CEST:
>
> Im porting a large code-base from windows to linux, and attempting to
> use autotools to do so. The code in SVN is essentially one big tree of
> somewhat related modules -- lets call them foo, bar, etc (Projects under
Hello,
I apologize if this has been answered somewhere. Ive read the book and
searched the archives.
My situation is this:
Im porting a large code-base from windows to linux, and attempting to
use autotools to do so. The code in SVN is essentially one big tree of
somewhat related modules -- le
13 matches
Mail list logo
