Re: Test support for automake

2011-02-13 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* NightStrike wrote on Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 02:10:32PM CET: > On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 4:51 PM, Daily, Jeff A wrote: > >> I have a non-recursive Makefile.am with which I build a library foo. I > >> list all my tests (quite a lot) in check_PROGRAMS. > >> > >> All those tests should (of course) get li

Re: Test support for automake

2011-02-13 Thread NightStrike
omake@gnu.org >> Subject: Test support for automake >> >> I have a non-recursive Makefile.am with which I build a library foo. I >> list all my tests (quite a lot) in check_PROGRAMS. >> >> All those tests should (of course) get libfoo.la as LDADD, but how >>

RE: Test support for automake

2011-02-12 Thread Daily, Jeff A
> From: automake-bounces+jeff.daily=pnl@gnu.org > [automake-bounces+jeff.daily=pnl@gnu.org] On Behalf Of Ralf Hemmecke > [hemme...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, February 11, 2011 11:18 AM > To: automake@gnu.org > Subject: Test support for automake > > I have a n

Test support for automake

2011-02-12 Thread Ralf Hemmecke
I have a non-recursive Makefile.am with which I build a library foo. I list all my tests (quite a lot) in check_PROGRAMS. All those tests should (of course) get libfoo.la as LDADD, but how exactly do I do that _without_ doing a per-target *_LDADD specification. Per target specification sounds