> "Derek" == Derek R Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Derek> Akim Demaille wrote:
>> What's wrong with the `missing' approach?
Derek> I ran automake the first time without the '--add-missing'
Derek> argument so when it told me it wouldn't run because "AUTHORS"
Derek> and "missing" weren't p
> "Derek" == Derek R Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Derek> What's the 'missing' approach?
When autoconf or automake is not found, the script `missing' is then
used, and touches the products.
~/src/am % ./missing --help nostromo 17:21
./missing [OPTION
Akim Demaille wrote:
> What's wrong with the `missing' approach?
I ran automake the first time without the '--add-missing' argument so
when it told me it wouldn't run because "AUTHORS" and "missing" weren't
present I simply touched the files in expectation of figuring out what
GNU wanted of me l
Akim Demaille wrote:
> What's wrong with the `missing' approach? What version of Automake
> are you using? I'm using CVS Automake for my package, and never found
> such problem.
Oh, Version 1.4. And what's 'CVS Automake' as opposed to automake?
Derek
--
Derek Price CVS
"Lars J. Aas" wrote:
> : And I'm totally against AM_MAINTAINER_MODE :)
>
> I always use it. I want every invokation of autoconf and automake to
> be explicit on my behalf. I even hate it when config.status goes into
> recheck mode.
I'm happy enough with them running automatically when the tool
Paul Berrevoets wrote:
> This should already be taken care of by the macro AM_MAINTAINER_MODE. If you use:
> ./configure --enable-maintainer-mode
> then the autoconf/automake targets are enabled. They should be disabled by default.
Doesn't it make more sense to enable/disable the targets bas
On Fri, Nov 03, 2000 at 04:49:23PM +0100, Akim Demaille wrote:
: > "Derek" == Derek R Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: Derek> This could be a very useful tool but without this feature I
: Derek> cannot use it in good conscience.
:
: What's wrong with the `missing' approach? What version o
Akim Demaille wrote:
> > "Derek" == Derek R Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Derek> This could be a very useful tool but without this feature I
> Derek> cannot use it in good conscience.
>
> What's wrong with the `missing' approach? What version of Automake
> are you using? I'm using C
> "Derek" == Derek R Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Derek> This could be a very useful tool but without this feature I
Derek> cannot use it in good conscience.
What's wrong with the `missing' approach? What version of Automake
are you using? I'm using CVS Automake for my package, and ne
This should already be taken care of by the macro AM_MAINTAINER_MODE. If you use:
./configure --enable-maintainer-mode
then the autoconf/automake targets are enabled. They should be disabled by default.
--
Paul
"Derek R. Price" wrote:
> This same applies to targets using autoconf & autoheade
This same applies to targets using autoconf & autoheader.
Derek
--
Derek Price CVS Solutions Architect ( http://CVSHome.org )
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] OpenAvenue ( http://OpenAvenue.com )
--
A burp is not an answer.
A burp is not an answer.
A burp is not an answer...
Automake seems to be creating targets by default that make use of
automake whether or not the user has automake installed. Timestamps
seem to get fouled up in distribution often enough that I think this is
very bad from a maintenance viewpoint (more questions to answer) and
very rude to users.
I
12 matches
Mail list logo
