| --- automake.in 22 Sep 2002 14:35:19 - 1.1360
| +++ automake.in 22 Sep 2002 18:58:10 -
| @@ -2542,8 +2542,6 @@
| {
| (my $xobj = $object) =~ s,lo$,\$(OBJEXT),;
| $compile_clean_files{$xobj} = MOSTLY_CLEAN;
| -
| -
>>> "Peter" == Peter Gavin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
Peter> But, make distclean fails to remove liba/.libs or any of
Peter> the files within, apparently because make distclean does
Peter> rm -f liba/liba.la instead of using libtool to remove
Peter> it.
Thanks. I'm installing the fo
>>> "Peter" == Peter Gavin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
Peter> Then a.o gets built in $(top_builddir), not
Peter> $(top_builddir)/a as I would have expected,
Peter> and as it would be using recursive make. Is this a bug,
Peter> or am I misunderstanding something?
You have to ask Auto
On Sat, Sep 21, 2002 at 06:36:10PM -0400, Peter Gavin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I decided to switch a project I'm working on to use a single top level Makefile,
>instead of using recursive make. One thing I noticed was that if you have this in
>your Makefile.am:
>
> bin_PROGRAMS = a/a
> a_a_SOURCES = a
Hi,
I decided to switch a project I'm working on to use a single top level Makefile,
instead of using recursive make. One thing I noticed was that if you have this in your
Makefile.am:
bin_PROGRAMS = a/a
a_a_SOURCES = a/a.c
Then a.o gets built in $(top_builddir), not $(top_builddir)/a as I wo
