Hi Jirka,
* Jirka Hanika wrote on Sat, Jun 04, 2005 at 10:12:18PM CEST:
>
> I've decided to send one more piece of reaction directly to you, because it
> doesn't belong to the automake list anymore and it might confuse the
> AC_COMPILER_OPTION thread on the autoconf list unless verbosely
> introd
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 03:12:48PM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Jirka Hanika <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > For example I'll try to upgrade the "unused variable" warning avoidance
> > code to something like
> >
> > if (((int)argv) * ((int)argv) < 0 || argc < 0) printf("");
>
> conftest.c: In
Jirka Hanika <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> For example I'll try to upgrade the "unused variable" warning avoidance
> code to something like
>
> if (((int)argv) * ((int)argv) < 0 || argc < 0) printf("");
conftest.c: In function ‘main’:
conftest.c:5: warning: cast from pointer to integer of differe
Hi Matthew, Stepan, Ralf,
first let me thank Ralf and Stepan, for your comments about the code
snippet, I've learned a lot. You are both right.
For example I'll try to upgrade the "unused variable" warning avoidance
code to something like
if (((int)argv) * ((int)argv) < 0 || argc < 0) printf(""
Hi Jirka,
Firstly, thank you very very much for your comments. They were well and
truly more thorough than I'd ever hoped for.
Unfortunately, I don't understand much of what you have said.
Jirka Hanika wrote:
On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 05:50:14PM +1200, Matthew Walker wrote:
Hi,
I would
Hi Jirko, Stepan,
* Stepan Kasal wrote on Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 08:44:48AM CEST:
>
> Regarding your macro MY_CXX_OPTION, if you want to be really portable,
> things can get even more scary.
This thread[1] contains a couple more hints. :)
> I think the definition of your macro can be improved.
>
Hello Jirko,
some nit picking:
Regarding your macro MY_CXX_OPTION, if you want to be really portable,
things can get even more scary. See
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/autoconf/2005-05/msg00109.html
This will point you to latest sources in the 1.5.x branch of libtool.
(The thread continues a
On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 05:50:14PM +1200, Matthew Walker wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to know how I should go about specifying AM_CPPFLAGS from
> within my configure.ac.
For such things, it is VERY useful to add something like this:
include $(top_srcdir)/Makefile.common
at the top of every Ma
Hi,
I would like to know how I should go about specifying AM_CPPFLAGS from
within my configure.ac.
I read Norman Gray and Alexandre Duret-Lutz's discussion from this
mailing list on this topic
(http://www.mail-archive.com/automake@gnu.org/msg10024.html) but could
not understand quite what I
