Re: Spam (was: »ç¹«¿ë°¡±¸ Á¾ÇÕ¼îÇθôÀÔ´Ï´Ù.)

2001-03-07 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Stephan" == Stephan Kulow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Maybe we could convince the GNU sysadmins to turn on spam blocking. Stephan> Speaking as mail admin for @kde.org I can only tell you that Stephan> this is impossible. I disagree. On sources.redhat.com we run lots of spam blocking.

Re: Spam (was: »ç¹«¿ë°¡±¸ Á¾ÇÕ¼îÇθôÀÔ´Ï´Ù.)

2001-03-07 Thread Stephan Kulow
Tom Tromey wrote: > > > "Allan" == Allan Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Allan> One alternative is to go to whatever egroup.com is now. Egroup > Allan> grew from bigfoot or something, it's a list-server that > Allan> requires that all posters are members of the list. > > We can't mov

Re: Spam (was: »ç¹«¿ë°¡±¸ Á¾ÇÕ¼îÇθôÀÔ´Ï´Ù.)

2001-03-07 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Allan" == Allan Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Allan> One alternative is to go to whatever egroup.com is now. Egroup Allan> grew from bigfoot or something, it's a list-server that Allan> requires that all posters are members of the list. We can't move the list. Maybe we could convinc

Re: Spam (was: »ç¹«¿ë°¡±¸ Á¾ÇÕ¼îÇθôÀÔ´Ï´Ù.)

2001-03-07 Thread Allan Clark
One alternative is to go to whatever egroup.com is now. Egroup grew from bigfoot or something, it's a list-server that requires that all posters are members of the list. Invites may be required. Or... GNU could extend their mailinglists to require authentication on their website and membership