* NightStrike wrote on Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 02:08:43AM CEST:
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 2:25 PM, John Calcote wrote:
> > A problem I foresee is providing the globbing functionality to makefile
> > commands. We'd almost need a new auxiliary script (like install-sh) to
> > generate lists of files fro
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 2:25 PM, John Calcote wrote:
> A problem I foresee is providing the globbing functionality to makefile
> commands. We'd almost need a new auxiliary script (like install-sh) to
> generate lists of files from such glob specs. Not sure yet from where the
> primary functionalit
* John Calcote wrote on Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 09:52:51PM CEST:
> I can certainly see how we may want to stick with the Automake
> "static source file specification" rules for the reasons you point
> out. In this case, it becomes more of an evangelistic documentation
> issue. :) That is, we might be
Hi Steffen,
On 4/19/2010 1:22 PM, Steffen Dettmer wrote:
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 8:25 PM, John Calcote wrote:
[...]
Builds in the Java world generally specify source files found
within a subtree using a globbing mechanism, with optionally
specified inclusions and exclusions.
Yes,
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 8:25 PM, John Calcote wrote:
[...]
> Builds in the Java world generally specify source files found
> within a subtree using a globbing mechanism, with optionally
> specified inclusions and exclusions.
Yes, they do. BTW, does anyone know why?
With some sarcasm someone cou
Hi John,
* John Calcote wrote on Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 08:25:22PM CEST:
> Since the current implementation of the JAVA primary is not managing
> individual source/object dependencies (something that's difficult to
> do anyway because of inner and anonymous class definitions), would
> it not be prud
Hi Ralf,
I've been thinking a lot about the JAVA primary lately. It turns out
that Automake's handling of Java sources is pretty efficient.
Experiments indicate that building ~500 Java source files in a single
command takes about 15 seconds on a 1.8 GHz CPU with 512 MB RAM. That
same set of 5
