Hello Benoit,
* Benoit SIGOURE wrote on Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 08:09:52AM CET:
> I find it annoying that when I have a (very) small package to which I add
> AC_PROG_CC (for instance) in configure.ac, the next invocation of `make'
> will fail:
>
> cd . && /bin/sh /tmp/ac/missing --run aclocal-1.10
Hi list,
I find it annoying that when I have a (very) small package to which I
add AC_PROG_CC (for instance) in configure.ac, the next invocation of
`make' will fail:
cd . && /bin/sh /tmp/ac/missing --run aclocal-1.10
cd . && /bin/sh /tmp/ac/missing --run automake-1.10 --foreign
Makefile.am:
> "John" == John Poltorak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> Not being an expert on AUTOMAKE, I was wondering how I could get
John> SED repackaged using the newer AUTOMAKE...
Probably. Talk to the sed maintainer.
John> I would run it myself, but I'm not sure how to go about it.
It might be
I have just discovered that I can build the latest GNU GREP v2.4.2 on
OS/2 without the need to amend any makefiles - although I do use an OS/2
specific version of AUTOCONF. When trying to build something like SED,
the final binary is not created as an EXE file. The differences between
the two ap
