* Peter Johansson wrote on Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 06:52:18PM CEST:
> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>> Oh. It seems your first message in this thread didn't make it to the
>> list then. Dunno whether it was eaten by the spam filter, but it is
>> not sitting in the moderation queue. You might consider rese
Hi Peter,
* Peter Johansson wrote on Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 07:50:56PM CEST:
> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>> could you please post this on-list unless it has huge size; that way,
>> others can profit (or comment, critize, help, ...), too.
>>
> Sorry, I don't understand. I attached the tarball and CC:
Hi Ralf,
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
could you please post this on-list unless it has huge size; that way,
others can profit (or comment, critize, help, ...), too.
Sorry, I don't understand. I attached the tarball and CC:d the automake
list. Are attachments filtered away when automake list is in
Hello Peter,
> On Jun 5, 2009 8:42am, Peter Johansson wrote:
>
>> I've attached a modified version of your package for which `make
>> distcheck' works. I'm not sure what structure you desire for the
>> installed header files, but that should be easy to adjust.
could you please post this on-l
johnwohlb...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks very much for the help Peter. The goal is to have the headers
installed and preserve the directory structure of the src. ie, after
make install
@prefix@/include/comp1/
comp1.hh
processed.hh
@prefix@/include/comp2/
comp2.hh
I haven't yet looked at your modif
On Jun 5, 2009 8:42am, Peter Johansson wrote:
Hi John,
John Wohlbier wrote:
Attached is an example package. What I left out of my original email was
that I'm putting the Makefile.am's out of the src/ directory to enable
building other architecture specific binaries within the same build.
Hope
Thanks again for the help Ralf.
>
> If that still doesn't help, it is useful to post a small example
>
> package.
>
Attached is an example package. What I left out of my original email was
that I'm putting the Makefile.am's out of the src/ directory to enable
building other architecture specific
Just because I think my reply is easily misunderstood:
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 07:47:50AM CEST:
> * johnwohlb...@gmail.com wrote on Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 12:24:29AM CEST:
> >
> > from lib1/Makefile.am
> >
> > nobase_include_HEADERS = \
> > $(header_file_list)
>
> The above
Hello John,
* johnwohlb...@gmail.com wrote on Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 12:24:29AM CEST:
> I'm having troubles with out of tree (vpath) builds, using
> nobase_include_HEADERS, and *.in files processed by configure.
I think you're making things more complicated than they need to be.
> I have a colle
