Stepan Kasal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 06:04:13PM -0700, Tyler MacDonald wrote:
>> Ed Hartnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> It sounds like the best plan would be to add a flag to "configure"
>> that indicates you want to build docs, like --with-build-do
Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello Ed,
>
Howdy Ralf!
> With PS this is reasonable: the .dvi file is not in the distribution,
> so the make rules try to update that. (Portable make syntax is not able
> to express this kind of intermediate dependency.) Solution is to put
> netcd
Hello,
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 06:04:13PM -0700, Tyler MacDonald wrote:
> Ed Hartnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It sounds like the best plan would be to add a flag to "configure"
> that indicates you want to build docs, like --with-build-docs using
> AC_ARG_WITH. [...]
a quick comment fr
Hello Ed,
* Ed Hartnett wrote on Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 01:20:36AM CEST:
>
> # Get lists of the corresponding ps, info, and pdf files.
> ps_docs = ${info_TEXINFOS:.texi=.ps}
> pdf_docs = ${info_TEXINFOS:.texi=.pdf}
> info_docs= ${info_TEXINFOS:.texi=.info}
> txt_docs= ${info_TEXINFOS:.texi=.txt}
>
Ed Hartnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What I want is to build the documentation on the developer's machine,
> include it in the distribution, and then install it.
>
> The documents are all texinfo documents, and we cannot require that
> every user machine have texinfo and tex installed.
