> "Rusty" == Rusty Ballinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I don't remember replying to this.
Rusty> One problem with the patch is that since the noinst_JAVA stuff
Rusty> is "noinst", there's no install-data-am dependency on
Rusty> "install-noinstJAVA" or classnoinst.stamp, so a "make install"
> > Hey, a thing that's bothered me for a while is that noinst_JAVA
> > is broken.
>
> Thanks, I checked in your patch.
One problem with the patch is that since the noinst_JAVA stuff is "noinst",
there's no install-data-am dependency on "install-noinstJAVA" or
classnoinst.stamp, so a "make instal
