Re: automake-1.16.92 released

2024-06-30 Thread Dave Hart
On Sun, 30 Jun 2024 at 05:03, Nick Bowler wrote: > [...] > > autoreconf decides to run libtoolize based on an m4 trace right after > it runs aclocal, looking for expansion of LT_INIT (or the older > AC_PROG_LIBTOOL). > > This means that for this to work at all: > > (1) a macro definition of LT_I

Re: automake-1.16.92 released

2024-06-29 Thread Nick Bowler
On 2024-06-29 07:28, Dave Hart wrote: > I'm seeing a regression building ntpd on FreeBSD 12.1 amd64 with > Autoconf 2.71 between Automake 1.16.5 and 1.16.92. I haven't filed a > bug report yet as I'm trying to do my part to characterize it well and > provide an easy reproduction. It may well be a

Re: automake-1.16.92 released

2024-06-29 Thread Dave Hart
On Sat, 29 Jun 2024 at 21:29, Karl Berry wrote: > Indeed. Thank you very much for the report (and the followup). The first > question that comes to mind: are you using the same version of libtool > in the various cases? --thanks again, karl. > Yes, on both systems it's libtool 2.4.6 I saw no in

Re: automake-1.16.92 released

2024-06-29 Thread Karl Berry
Hi Dave, in case it affects a decision to release 1.17 Indeed. Thank you very much for the report (and the followup). The first question that comes to mind: are you using the same version of libtool in the various cases? --thanks again, karl.

Re: automake-1.16.92 released

2024-06-29 Thread Dave Hart
I'm seeing a regression building ntpd on FreeBSD 12.1 amd64 with Autoconf 2.71 between Automake 1.16.5 and 1.16.92. I haven't filed a bug report yet as I'm trying to do my part to characterize it well and provide an easy reproduction. It may well be a bug in our use of Automake, in which case I a