Re: Patch 1 of 4: Better DOS path support

2001-02-20 Thread Akim Demaille
"Tim Van Holder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > suggest that your patch makes them uniform. And of course, the same > > as promoted by autoconf.texi :) > How do you mean, Akim? autoconf.texi doesn't say anything > about this... Or do you want me to add such an entry? Arg, sorry, I really thoug

RE: Patch 1 of 4: Better DOS path support

2001-02-19 Thread Tim Van Holder
> > - /* | [A-Za-z]:*) ;; > > - */*) prog="`pwd`/$prog" ;; > > + [/\\]* | [A-Za-z]:[/\\]*) ;; > > + *[\\/]*) prog="`pwd`/$prog" ;; > > > @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ > > # Always use an absolute srcdir. Otherwise symlinks made in subdirs > > # of the test dir just won't work. > > case "$srcdir" in > > -

Re: Patch 1 of 4: Better DOS path support

2001-02-19 Thread Akim Demaille
"Tim Van Holder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > - /* | [A-Za-z]:*) ;; > - */*) prog="`pwd`/$prog" ;; > + [/\\]* | [A-Za-z]:[/\\]*) ;; > + *[\\/]*) prog="`pwd`/$prog" ;; > @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ > # Always use an absolute srcdir. Otherwise symlinks made in subdirs > # of the test dir just won't work