Hi,
On 2013-07-26 16:53 +0100, Rudra Banerjee wrote:
> Hello friends,
> In my laptop, I can very well use autotools with the following
> Makefile.am :
> bin_PROGRAMS = scasr
> scasr_SOURCES = src/main.f90\
> src/constants.f90 src/environment.f90 src/util.f90 \
>
On 2013-03-24 11:33 +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> If you switch to non-recursive make (i.e. no use of SUBDIRS),
> but you want to use "include" to retain Makefile.ams in
> subdirectories, you end up running into problems when you
> have multiple copies of -local and -hook rules.
[...]
> I've used GNU
Hi John,
* John Darrington wrote on Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 07:56:20PM CET:
> I like to use a non-recursive makefile structure for my projects.
> However, if the project also uses gettext, I end up having to
> constantly fight against both gettext and auto{conf,make}.
>
> If AM_GNU_GETTEXT appears i
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 1:39 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Hello,
>
> * Jan Engelhardt wrote on Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 07:04:39PM CEST:
>> when one decides to drive make in a non-recursive fashion, one has to
>> write an Automake file like this:
>>
>> lib_LTLIBRARIES = foo/bar.la
>> foo_bar_la_SOURCE
On Sun, 2009-10-18 at 08:39 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/automake/2001-08/msg00112.html
> >
> > This added a new directive 'subdir_include' which does an include but
> > adjusts all the paths in the make/automake rules in the included
> > fragment to the relative
Hello,
* Jan Engelhardt wrote on Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 07:04:39PM CEST:
> when one decides to drive make in a non-recursive fashion, one has to
> write an Automake file like this:
>
> lib_LTLIBRARIES = foo/bar.la
> foo_bar_la_SOURCES = foo/one.c foo/two.c
>
> Usually I stuff that into a file cal
On Sat, 2009-10-17 at 20:09 -0500, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
>
> I complained about this perhaps five years ago since it is the most
> annoying issue related to non-recursive build. There was some
> discussion on this list at that time but nothing was done to make
> things better.
>
> It seems t
On Sat, 17 Oct 2009, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
when one decides to drive make in a non-recursive fashion, one has to
write an Automake file like this:
lib_LTLIBRARIES = foo/bar.la
foo_bar_la_SOURCES = foo/one.c foo/two.c
Usually I stuff that into a file called "foo/Automakefile" and "include
foo/A
> "Bob" == Bob Friesenhahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bob> Note that the messages appear to indicate that Automake does recurse
Bob> once regardless.
Some features require a $(MAKE) invocation in the same directory.
Offhand I forget what. As I recall, removing this would be tricky.
Tom
Hello Bob,
> % time gmake
> gmake all-am
> gmake[1]: Entering directory
> `/scratch/bfriesen/build/GraphicsMagick-16-static'
> gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/scratch/bfriesen/build/GraphicsMagick-16-static'
> gmake 0.78s user 0.10s system 88% cpu 0.990 total
> %
>
> Note that the messages appea
On Mon, 29 Aug 2005, tom fogal wrote:
Your arguments are convincing, I will switch my setup away from
convenience archives.
As you proceed with your non-recursive build, be sure to keep in mind
that you are leaving the common path so you can expect to encounter
more bugs or things that need
On Mon, 29 Aug 2005, Tom Tromey wrote:
"tom" == tom fogal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
tom> Basically I'd like each module to build their own libtool convenience
tom> library, and then have /src/Makefile.am link all of those modules'
tom> convenience libraries into one that is the union of all
*mutter*, forgot to cc the list again...
--- Forwarded Message
From: tom fogal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Bob Friesenhahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: non-recursive automake advice?
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 29 Aug 2005 18:29:09 CDT."
<[EMAI
> "tom" == tom fogal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
tom> Basically I'd like each module to build their own libtool convenience
tom> library, and then have /src/Makefile.am link all of those modules'
tom> convenience libraries into one that is the union of all of them.
Do you really want each sep
On Mon, 29 Aug 2005, tom fogal wrote:
So I've been convinced that the effort involved in changing a build
system to not use recursive make is worth it, and I was wondering if
A noble objective.
Unfortunately in the 'Inc.am' files I need to remember to qualify every
filename with not just '$(
15 matches
Mail list logo
