On Thu, 5 Oct 2000, kitkat wrote:
> Hi Simon, thanks for your quick reply !
This one took a little longer however... :-)
> 1.) xxx.h (gets changed)
> 2.) xxx.cxx ( xxx.h is included by xxx.cxx -> this dependency forces
> recompilation of xxx.cxx)
> 3.) now not only the c-compiler should run
Hi Simon, thanks for your quick reply !
> > The right time to call the meta-compiler would be after a source-file
> > has been compiled.
>
> [...]
>
> I suppose your "meta-compiler" (is it a documentation generator?) creates
> some sort of output files.
In fact it's more a kind of signal/slot
On Thu, 5 Oct 2000, kitkat wrote:
> The right time to call the meta-compiler would be after a source-file
> has been compiled.
[...]
I suppose your "meta-compiler" (is it a documentation generator?) creates
some sort of output files. The best thing to do then is to add the
necessary rule for th