Hello Albert,
* Albert Chin wrote on Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 09:45:10PM CET:
>
> I don't know if this is easy, but check-TESTS could be modified to
> iterate over more than one $(TESTS) variable:
> check-TESTS: $(TESTS1) $(TESTS2) $(TESTS3) ...
> @failed=0; all=0; xfail=0; xpass=0; skip=
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 03:24:14PM -0600, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Feb 2007, Albert Chin wrote:
> >
> >I don't know if this is easy, but check-TESTS could be modified to
> >iterate over more than one $(TESTS) variable:
> > check-TESTS: $(TESTS1) $(TESTS2) $(TESTS3) ...
>
> There are like
On Tue, 6 Feb 2007, Albert Chin wrote:
I don't know if this is easy, but check-TESTS could be modified to
iterate over more than one $(TESTS) variable:
check-TESTS: $(TESTS1) $(TESTS2) $(TESTS3) ...
There are likely Makefile.am files which are using the value of TESTS
for other purposes. Th
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 09:06:42AM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Albert Chin wrote on Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 05:52:43AM CET:
> > ImageMagick-6.2.9 has a large number of tests. The check-TESTS rule in
> > automake-1.10 is:
> > check-TESTS: $(TESTS)
> > ...
> > list=' $(TESTS) '; \
>
Hi Albert,
Thanks for the report.
* Albert Chin wrote on Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 05:52:43AM CET:
> ImageMagick-6.2.9 has a large number of tests. The check-TESTS rule in
> automake-1.10 is:
> check-TESTS: $(TESTS)
> ...
> list=' $(TESTS) '; \
> Because AIX 4.3.3 has a small limit on t
