Hi Marc,
thanks a lot for your assistance. Now I think I understand the point.
It seems like a good solution for the future, however, I don't have
the time to try this right now, and in the short term it doesn't seem
to bring significant improvements, besides allowing me to get rid of
--whole-arc
Hi Stefan
Stefan Puiu wrote:
Hi Marc,
what can I say, on one hand you've made me curious about this option.
We're also experiencing long linking times (well, nothing compared to
the old project you mentioned), but still, 4 minutes for linking in
one modified library is a bit much.
:-)
L
Hi and thanks for replying,
On 4/19/06, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Stefan,
> Have you ever considered using Libtool? Its convenience archives would
> be a portable alternative to --whole-archive.
I'm not that familiar with libtool. And you have to bear in mind that
for most
Hi Marc,
what can I say, on one hand you've made me curious about this option.
We're also experiencing long linking times (well, nothing compared to
the old project you mentioned), but still, 4 minutes for linking in
one modified library is a bit much.
Unfortunately, we're not using libtool yet.
Hi Stefan,
* Stefan Puiu wrote on Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 04:23:04PM CEST:
>
> I was considering to file this as a bug report, but I thought I'd
> first check on the list first. Sorry if this was already brought up
> (there's also a bug report which is somewhat similar to my problem -
> automake PR
Hi Stefan
Stefan Puiu wrote:
So, my problem is that for some reason in our projects some libraries
*have* to be linked in using a --whole-archive/--no-whole-archive wrap
around them. I also use --start-group/--end-group when I have to add a
long list of libraries (dozens) and I don't want to w
