Re: DEFS vs. INCLUDES

2000-02-21 Thread Tom Tromey
Linus> hmpf! :) [ ... ] Linus> (AM_CLFAGS, hmmm... American C language fags? :-) It is early here. My fingers aren't awake yet. Linus> I don't want to pass any `-I' to m4 since some m4's don't like that, Linus> so using INCLUDES is no good. How should AM_CFLAGS be used? Ah. Don't use DEFS or

Re: DEFS vs. INCLUDES

2000-02-21 Thread Linus Nordberg
Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote Mon, 21 Feb 2000 07:31:12 -0800 (PST): > "Linus" == Linus Nordberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Linux> I would like to pass a few -D to m4, but don't want the `-I':s. ^ hmpf! :) Use INCLUDES to hard-code your own options. You can

Re: DEFS vs. INCLUDES

2000-02-21 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Linus" == Linus Nordberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Linus> What's the reason behind putting all `-I' stuff in DEFS? If you mean in Makefile.in, it is laziness. Linux> I would like to pass a few -D to m4, but don't want the `-I':s. Use INCLUDES to hard-code your own options. You can (an