* JRS (j...@hug.gs) [20090427 23:22]:
> Redhat and Debian derived distributions ship -debug and -dbg packages
> which put symbol-only files under /usr/lib/debug.
openSUSE/SLES use -debuginfo and -debugsource packages. The former install
symbol-only files und /usr/lib/debug while the latter instal
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 09:47:42PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * JRS wrote on Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 11:23:13PM CEST:
> > On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 10:01:18AM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > > I don't yet see how degrading gracefully is easily possible with the
> > > functionality you propose,
* JRS wrote on Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 11:23:13PM CEST:
> On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 10:01:18AM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > I don't yet see how degrading gracefully is easily possible with the
> > functionality you propose, as a program to remove all but the debug
> > symbols is AFAIK not present
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 10:01:18AM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Well, one important bit for features that Automake aims to offer is
> that, while we don't mind exploiting the better functionality present
> on powerful systems like GNU/Linux, we would like to be able to degrade
> gracefully on l
Hello Jason, all,
* Jason Spence wrote on Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 08:01:20AM CEST:
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 07:33:47AM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > * JRS wrote on Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 07:02:55AM CEST:
> > > I was setting up build infrastructure once again when it occurred to
> > > me, hmm, wou
Hello Jason,
* JRS wrote on Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 05:57:53PM CEST:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 11:01:20PM -0700, Jason Spence wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 07:33:47AM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > > Just get the git tree here:
> > >
> > > git clone git://git.sv.gnu.org/automake.git
> >
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 11:01:20PM -0700, Jason Spence wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 07:33:47AM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > Just get the git tree here:
> >
> > git clone git://git.sv.gnu.org/automake.git
> > cd automake
> > ./bootstrap
> >
> > and then get hacking. README, tests
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 05:08:16PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>
> On Thursday 2009-04-23 14:51, Bob Rossi wrote:
> >
> >>> What's the advantage over just installing binaries into $(bindir)
> >>> without stripping them? **Non-brain-damaged** systems won't
> >>> load them from the file anyway for
On Thursday 2009-04-23 14:51, Bob Rossi wrote:
>
>>> What's the advantage over just installing binaries into $(bindir)
>>> without stripping them? **Non-brain-damaged** systems won't
>>> load them from the file anyway for normal execution.
[emphasis added by me]
>On mingw/msys the executables wi
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 11:01:20PM -0700, Jason Spence wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 07:33:47AM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > Hello,
First off, I want to say thank you, for bringing this feature to my
attention. This could be an excellent addition to our build system.
> > * JRS wrote on W
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 07:33:47AM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Hello,
>
> * JRS wrote on Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 07:02:55AM CEST:
> > I was setting up build infrastructure once again when it occurred to
> > me, hmm, wouldn't it be nice if automake had default targets for
> > installing symbols?
On Wednesday 2009-04-22 07:33, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>* JRS wrote on Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 07:02:55AM CEST:
>> I was setting up build infrastructure once again when it occurred to
>> me, hmm, wouldn't it be nice if automake had default targets for
>> installing symbols?
>>
>> For example, make in
Hello,
* JRS wrote on Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 07:02:55AM CEST:
> I was setting up build infrastructure once again when it occurred to
> me, hmm, wouldn't it be nice if automake had default targets for
> installing symbols?
>
> For example, make install-syms could do objcopy --only-keep-debug on
> th
13 matches
Mail list logo
