> "Tom" == Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Tom> I still think we should have a separate class per language. This
Tom> seems cleanest by far. It might seem heavy now, but we'll be
Tom> kicking ourselves in a year if we don't do it.
I'm convinced Tom :) Really, the only obstacle is t
> "Akim" == Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Akim> The patch is really a proposal: it relies on a modified version of
Akim> Perl 5.6's Class::Struct. The modification are minimal, and just
Akim> ensure that it works with 5.005:
I like this but we can't use it until the licensing is
> "Akim" == Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Akim> The patch is really a proposal: it relies on a modified version
Akim> of Perl 5.6's Class::Struct. The modification are minimal, and
Akim> just ensure that it works with 5.005:
I've already weighed in on most of this...
Akim> I st
You have emailed Dr Damian Conway of the School of Computer Science and
Software Engineering, Monash University.
Damian is indisposed at present and we have been informed that he may
not be able to respond email for the next two weeks. Your message will
be stored until then.
[This is an autorep
> "David" == David Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
David> You'll know this yourself, of course, as maintainer of
David> "automake", which is why we are agreeing.
I'm not an Automake maintainer, just a prolix participant :) Tom
Tromey is the maintainer.
Damian,
You are Cc'ed as the Class::Struct maintainer (?). We are considering
using Perl 5.6's Class::Struct with Automake, but with perl 5.5 as
highest requirement. It works fine once you removed most recent 5.6
features which we don't need in Automake.
There are several issues related to th
On 26 Mar 2001, Akim Demaille wrote:
> > "David" == David Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> David> Wouldn't it be cleaner to talk with the maintainers of
> David> Class::Struct with a view to making Class::Struct itself able
> David> to work on "lesser" versions of Perl? (And automake cou
> "David" == David Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
David> Wouldn't it be cleaner to talk with the maintainers of
David> Class::Struct with a view to making Class::Struct itself able
David> to work on "lesser" versions of Perl? (And automake could then
David> use the Real Thing.)
That was wh
On Sun, 25 Mar 2001, Akim Demaille wrote:
> The patch is really a proposal: it relies on a modified version of
> Perl 5.6's Class::Struct. The modification are minimal, and just
> ensure that it works with 5.005:
>
> [...]
>
> I still have no idea whether the license makes it possible for us t
