Re: 17-proto-autoscan-check.patch

2001-01-22 Thread Tom Tromey
Akim> I'll investigate where this is coming from. Can it be sufficient? Yes. Tom

Re: 17-proto-autoscan-check.patch

2001-01-22 Thread Akim Demaille
> "Tom" == Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Tom> I don't know why. Does configure AC_SUBST(CXX)? /tmp/fileutils-4.0.37 % fgrep CXX configure nostromo 20:03 s,@CXXFLAGS@,$CXXFLAGS,;t t I'll investigate where this is coming from. Can it be sufficient?

Re: 17-proto-autoscan-check.patch

2001-01-22 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Akim" == Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Akim> (iii): why the heck does automake include CXX related macros in Akim> the fileutils Makefile.ins??? This is very confusing to Akim> autoscan, and frankly, I don't think this is good. I don't know why. Does configure AC_SUBST(CXX)?

Re: 17-proto-autoscan-check.patch

2001-01-22 Thread Akim Demaille
Actually, I'd like to apply this patch anyway, since the following patches are making it more useful. Let me show you what it does when all the patches are applied: /tmp/fileutils-4.0.37 % ../ace/autoscan -A ../ace nostromo 9:47 Name "main::args" used only once: possible typo at