Hi Alfred,
* Alfred M. Szmidt wrote on Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 08:33:10PM CET:
> You didn't answer why you need this switch, only that you want it.
Various threads on this list during the last months document this,
I would say. It otherwise isn't even hard to guess. ;-)
Cheers,
Ralf
You didn't answer why you need this switch, only that you want it.
[Note that this has nothing to do with the bootstrap file]
On Sunday 2009-11-15 17:44, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
> Index: automake/m4/init.m4
> ===
> --- automake.orig/m4/init.m4
> +++ automake/m4/init.m4
> @@ -107,6 +107,7
Index: automake/m4/init.m4
===
--- automake.orig/m4/init.m4
+++ automake/m4/init.m4
@@ -107,6 +107,7 @@ dnl is hooked onto _AC_COMPILER_EXEEXT e
AC_CONFIG_COMMANDS_PRE(dnl
[m4_provide_if([_AM_COMPILER_EXEEXT],
On Sat, 14 Nov 2009, Peter Johansson wrote:
From where did you get that rule? It doesn't go very well with the fact that
automake by default adds Makefile.am, configure.ac and other .m4 files to the
tarball. Those files will never be useful for a pure ./configure; make; make
install, but as s
On Saturday 2009-11-14 14:06, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>Hi Jan,
>
>* Jan Engelhardt wrote on Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 02:09:14AM CET:
>> in the automake tarballs, the 'bootstrap' script is missing, but it
>> would be needed when modifying any of the automake files in a tarball.
>
>Sounds reasonable t
On Sat, 2009-11-14 at 09:35 -0500, Peter Johansson wrote:
> Gaetan Nadon wrote:
> >
> > If you want to modify files in automake, then you are doing development,
> > rather than just installing the software. Given that automake requires
> > itself, there may be special things to do. In any case, no
Gaetan Nadon wrote:
If you want to modify files in automake, then you are doing development,
rather than just installing the software. Given that automake requires
itself, there may be special things to do. In any case, nothing should
be added to the tarball that isn't required for installation.
On Sat, 2009-11-14 at 14:06 +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Hi Jan,
>
> * Jan Engelhardt wrote on Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 02:09:14AM CET:
> > in the automake tarballs, the 'bootstrap' script is missing, but it
> > would be needed when modifying any of the automake files in a tarball.
>
> Sounds r
Hi Jan,
* Jan Engelhardt wrote on Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 02:09:14AM CET:
> in the automake tarballs, the 'bootstrap' script is missing, but it
> would be needed when modifying any of the automake files in a tarball.
Sounds reasonable to me, esp. since it doesn't even use git in any way
(yet).
>
* Eric Polino wrote on Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 10:31:43PM CEST:
>
> I'm sort of confused on my options, is this correct?
>
> 1. AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR([.]) in finch/libgnt/configure.ac &&
>AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR([.]) in configure.ac
>
> OR
>
> 2. AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR([.]) in finch/libgnt/configure.ac &&
>
On 7/24/07, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Eric,
* Eric Polino wrote on Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 06:00:44AM CEST:
>
> Here lies the problem. If I run toplevel/ag.sh it creates
> finch/libgnt/Makefile.in, as it always has and should. Within there
> it generates a variable called D
Hello Eric,
* Eric Polino wrote on Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 06:00:44AM CEST:
>
> Here lies the problem. If I run toplevel/ag.sh it creates
> finch/libgnt/Makefile.in, as it always has and should. Within there
> it generates a variable called DIST_COMMON which doesn't reference the
> automake scripts
> "Akim" == Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Ralf" == Ralf Corsepius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ralf> Related question: Which directory is am_dir/--am-dir supposed to
Ralf> point to, now? <..>/automake/ or <..>/automake/am?
Akim> Good question. No idea what Tom will prefer.
> "Ralf" == Ralf Corsepius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ralf> Hi, At present time, automake --add-missing is broken.
Ralf> Apparent cause is this patch below.
Doh!
Thanks! Weird that the test suite did not catch this.
Ralf> Related question: Which directory is am_dir/--am-dir supposed to
R
Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Nov 13, 2000, "Derek R. Price" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Okay, is there some way short of symlinking the
> > /usr/share/automake/texinfo.tex file by hand to make sure that automake
> > --add-missing uses the "proper" texinfo.tex file (i.e. the one installed
> >
On Nov 13, 2000, "Derek R. Price" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Okay, is there some way short of symlinking the
> /usr/share/automake/texinfo.tex file by hand to make sure that automake
> --add-missing uses the "proper" texinfo.tex file (i.e. the one installed
> with the texinfo package and assume
17 matches
Mail list logo
